---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andy Smith <andy@andys-place.co.uk>
Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [london-hack-space] Quad Copter Guys! Your Razor Gyro
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
From: Andy Smith <andy@andys-place.co.uk>
Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 at 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [london-hack-space] Quad Copter Guys! Your Razor Gyro
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com
FYI, I've found this paper really useful for understanding some IMU theory...
http://gentlenav.googlecode.com/files/DCMDraft2.pdf
Andy
-----Original message-----
From: Ben Blundell <oni@section9.co.uk>
Sent: Mon 30-05-2011 22:14
To: london-hack-space@googlegroups.com;
Subject: Re: [london-hack-space] Quad Copter Guys! Your Razor Gyro
Yes, the drift would be more of an issue with the UAV I'd sayI found this:I'm looking at using it at the moment. Its not Kalman but I think it could work?Ben
<snip>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
http://www.google.com/profiles/technologiclee
No comments:
Post a Comment